Italian Magazine Chi To Publish More Photos Of Kate Middleton Topless

Italian magazine Chi will publish even more photos of Kate Middleton topless this Monday. This must be devastating news for poor Kate, who already had her privacy invaded this week when French magazine Closer published photos of Kate sunbathing topless with Prince William in the south of France.

The Royal couple is already taking legal action against Closer magazine, but that won’t take away the feeling of having her private life intruded upon by the paparazzi. On Friday, a rep for the palace said, “St James’ Palace confirms that legal proceedings for breach of privacy have been commenced today in France by The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge against the publishers of Closer Magazine France.”

The legal action still didn’t dissuade Chi magazine from promising a very special new issue on Monday with 26 pages on Kate Middleton and Prince William, which include topless photos of Kate.

“It is a story worth publishing in an extraordinary edition because it shows in a natural light the everyday life of a very famous contemporary young couple in love,” said Alfonso Signorini, Chi’s editor-in-chief, to CNN via email. “The fact that they happen to be the future king and queen of England certainly makes it more interesting and current, and in line with today’s concept of monarchy.”

We imagine this is extremely heartbreaking for Kate who is currently touring Southeast Asia with Prince William. We hope she manages to stay strong as she embarks on her many more official visits.

Related Link: French Magazine Closer Publishes Topless Photos Of Kate Middleton

Photo Courtesy of: KEYSTONE

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

    1 Comment

    Tags: , , , , , , , ,

    One Response to “Italian Magazine Chi To Publish More Photos Of Kate Middleton Topless”

    1. cidy says:

      Whats the big deal, she looks fabulous with or ithout her top

    Leave a Reply

     Please answer question below to comment.
    What is 5 + 2 ? 
    Please leave these two fields as-is: